The information on this Website is not reliable and not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice. Nothing contained on the Website shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction.
CEO.CA members discuss high-risk penny stocks which can lose their entire value. Only risk what you can afford to lose.
@FundamentalAnalysis@anonymous Don't think people deny climate change, I've seen very weird weather shifts just in my lifetime, seasons all messed up, snow at odd times etc... but its more what is behind the change...I'm inclined to believe geophysics is primarily the reason, and man made causes are just a sideshow
@rangerbentman@anonymous just to be clear: "Please perform your own due diligence to decide whether these companies and sectors are best suited for your personal investment criteria.
This site features highly speculative penny stocks, and should not be construed as investment or professional advice of any kind. From time to time, we may transact in securities mentioned. All facts are to be verified by the reader and all readers to do their own due diligence before investing including talking to a licensed financial adviser." I know people who just look at the chart and have absolutely no clue as to what the company does. I think you need as much information as possible to make a quality decision.
@FundamentalAnalysis@anonymous Work hard, take calculated risks? What's with the get rich quick crowds, not a fan....those are the idiots who mortgage their house to bet on a stock that they think they know a lot about.
@Baz@anonymous No problem. Still possible to mine some "under the radar" cryptos, since there are less of them on the market, it would be easier to mine them, because you wouldn't need to find prime numbers as high as you would need to mine others with more coins already on the market... But you have to mine the one that will get popular in the future. It costs money for the servers you would use for that, cooling, electricity, etc... And I heard that it would cost more then what it would give in value for mining well established cryptos, let's say the top 10... So you have to be sure that the crypto you're mining will gain value and won't crash in the future, or else it would be a total loss... I think it's safer to trade them instead unless you already have huge CPU infrastructures or pretty good computers knowledge. ;)
@MiningBookGuy@SamJones@Vaughan - I'm disappointed by the lack of public #watchlists shared so far. I agree with @Vaughan that there needs to be more social features at CEO.CA, and I love the potential of this one. I want it to encourage more #newbies to share what they are following, just as much as people who are already heavily followed.
Maybe it's just a matter of making the #watchlists easily visible on the CEO.CA homepage. I applaud the developers for continued experimentation. Unfortunately, I consider ~Panels to be an overall failure in the sense that very few have created regular conversations (but it's a great learning experience for everyone).
#Watchlists will go beyond being public as well, as @Vaughan mentioned. I don't know what it takes to get 'new' people sharing things. But we need more voices at CEO.CA, instead of hearing tired old ones (like me!).
btw, @anonymous is a bit too cynical with his/her "one-eyed man" comments. I agree with some of this, but definitely not all of it (though perhaps too cryptic for me to understand the 'true meaning' anyway!) #mbgtrends
@MiningBookGuy@anonymous - observation 7 & 8 bugged me
on #8, "THE MOST IMPORTANT POSTS ARE THE ONES YOU HATE TO READ." there is so much drivel on ceo.ca that i 'hate' (excellent example being martin armstrong stuff pushed by nobs, much of it literally cut-and-pasted with minimal context), it just doesn't apply here. On the other hand, there is a TON of quality stuff that is simply ignored. i find the best content isn't 'hated', but people just aren't paying attention.
if you want proof, just notice all the good stuff @luctenhave posted over the past year, and how he only really started getting followed AFTER some of the big wins...he isn't the only person that has experienced this.
on #7, "THOSE WHO KNOW DO NOT POST, THOSE WHO POST DO NOT KNOW." kind of true...but we then get to the point that people feel like they shouldn't be posting anything. really, we NEED more new posters at ceo.ca! of course everyone has an agenda here (#2, and i was happy to see you post that point). but it sure doesn't help when a few users continuously steal attention from others, because that's what is often happening.
if anything, some of those 'who know' are NOT posting precisely because they are sick of others grabbing attention and posting drivel. CEO.CA is working on new tools to improve this.
anyway, i like your observations overall, but wanted to add a little clarity to what i was thinking. i'm happy to discuss further if anyone is interested. #mbgtrends#newbies
@nobshere@anonymous Far as Im concerned Med MJ will be around for a long time .pos even food additives ...The other after u see the zombies will be banned Doing deal with right people so I hope it goes thru ---I have never looked into $gea-h --Well neither has anyone re mj deal
@anonymousA resource... really?! 8 holes drilled at Treaty in 2016 with a handful of them being dusters. At best the resource will be 1.5M ounces Au from 50 million tons at with average grade of .3g/t Au. This thing will never even be close to economic.
@FundamentalAnalysis@anonymous Not true, too much of a generalisation. I've made u-turns on some of my decisions in the past. Personally I encourage people to post negative information on this stock. You should follow my comments....I'm always bearish biased in general even with stocks I own. $ORG#newbies#mbgtrends
@FundamentalAnalysis@anonymous as to @miningBookGuy I would say he is a leader in his niche, as he likes to look where no one else is looking and doesn't just follow some of the well knowns names on ceo.ca. However he is more optimistic then I am about things, and sees the good in things as oppose to bad. So maybe one eyed in that respect.
@Baz@anonymous They were already in business with Microsoft for eMail encryption, but now with very positive users feedback and Microsoft pushing further their collaboration with $ID, it means they are not anymore just testing their products, now it is a solid partnership IMHO.
@Baz@anonymous Well I don't hold the truth, but IMO this AM news means the relationship between Microsoft and $ID just got stronger than ever before. May 30 was the official launch of a plugin for a product Microsoft already received good feedbacks from users during testing period, and I think that if Microsoft fully integrates $ID s Delivery Trust + Secure Scan, it means $ID has a nice future with them = $$$. That's my opionion, you don't have to trust it.
@MiningBookGuy@Edp007 - i really appreciate the kind words! i know there are a lot of people that do NOT care for my posts.
honestly, i have a personal goal of getting NEW people posting at ceo.ca. And I would GLADLY post less if I knew there was a direct correlation to more new people posting (and maybe people don't believe me on that, but I'm serious).
And you're right that @Allan is an important part of the CEO.CA ecosystem, and sometimes his more personal/random posts are a 'value-add'. But I also agree with what @anonymous just wrote.... Allan and some others (sometimes including me) 'clog up' the #index. I am very sure that 'new voices' are less likely to appear when this happens.
What @Allan just said is BS, in terms of just 'ignoring my posts'. It doesn't work that way unless CEO.CA lets me put @Allan on 'ignore'. Not saying I would necessarily do that. And I am fine with people putting me on 'ignore'. That type of thing.
Anyway, all roads seem to be leading to #lounge, if there will never be an 'ignore' feature here.
@soulMiner@anonymous@clawbongo I guess this comes down to their true intent. If their intent is purely to have an escape mechanism and make money out of it in the process then us SH are truly screwed. If their real intention is to rebalance ownership to the entire CDB staked district because they really believe there is great potential there then we all have a chance to make some money.
@EvenPrime@anonymous - @redrocket and @highball are both interested in $CXO , they're somebody :) Even though im pretty sure Highball is Lowball who is rocketRed lol but regardless ... still someone. I admit, I still follow it, but never owned it.
@MadeOfRubber@anonymous Not fear, frustration, big difference. Fear was $azs a couple weeks ago. I don't see any comments above of people exiting. Point is discussion. If you have info or something useful to add, feel free.
Jasond @Anonymous your guess is as good as mine. I feel likely around .40. I too feel most that are in this trade bought into the .55 financing. @DanO wouldn't see why the Chilean properties are not that good like you say. Difference is these new properties one is a producing mine. Just my 2 cents. Fwiw
@stocklorteal @anonymous, @teevee is da' man!!!!! I like TV, @Allan doesn't like TV. TV has been there, knows of what he speaks. When TV speaks, @stocklor listens. TV has added to my treasurie, along with @dellsvigor, @LucTenHave, well the list is long. I don't want to bore you. If you post a name, I'll PM you a 5 bagge
@EvenPrime@anonymous yeah man, I dont mean to come off rude or anything, just saying how things usually go. I like $CXO and I think you are right that this will be a good one in the coming months, but ... u know exactly where Im coming from.
@anonymousgrades are weak. chances of finding the next Oyu Tolgoi, literally right next to Oyu Tolgoi? slim in my opinion. sure, porphyries don't usually occur isolation, but this does not mean that there is one on $kcc land package. we are going to need a few more drill programs AT LEAST, to find it. if you are looking to profit from this stock you will need to be VERY patient. just as patient as freidland and soros have been and will continue to be, and even then there is still a high probability that you will never profit at all. both friedland know the odds of finding another porphyry system right next to OT and they have allocated funds accordingly. soros only holds $1.5million, which is money he can afford to lose ($26 billion net worth). this is a long shot and everyone knows it. there is also a premium to pay for the sole involvement of friedland and soros. having these two guys involved does not increase the odds of having metal in the ground. the land is land and that is that. do your own DD. dont let the names 'friedland' and 'soros' blind you from overpaying for a barely-drilled plot of land.
@IronMan07@anonymous everyone in the know, should agree that News was "off side" -or- ahead of reality...best they don't repeat this situation. Although by responding here this afternoon, this old man fighting cancer, is getting a great brain/spelling workout.
@IronMan07@anonymous you comment about a Stock getting too many posts, as you post 5 times here. ROTFLMAO Why not post with your real name so everyone can see whether you have any credibility...? I'll answer for you...you're just here to bash to shake out shares. Do give you credit for doing DD on NC, and see the urgency to start bashing.