$NRN 0 online
Members of #nrn
Moderators
Members
click to invite
@CautiousNow @rdww Out of curiosity, what does it look like at 3.5 and 3? Thanks.
0
click to invite
@rdww 350K each approx. same for 0.025 w 7 or 8 buyers at each level
0
click to invite
@CautiousNow @rdww Thanks.
0
click to invite
@wolff Well I think that is pretty much it for cheap shares - new investors will be paying 5 or 6 cents for a lottery ticket from here on. Still cheap at that price and should see 10-15 cents by summer. Watch the stakearoundologists CLE for news as well.
0
click to invite
@rdww and Midland (MD) may be one to keep an eye on more so, since they are working in the area or reported back in the fall that they were drilling
0
click to invite
@wolff Thanks @rdww I was not aware of their play in the area -- https://ceo.ca/@marketwired/midland-acquires-new-project-with-strong-zinc-copper
0
click to invite
@wolff Here is some info on the stakearoundolgists holdings -- basically staked everything around NRN hoping NRN hit https://www.cleancommodities.com/labrador-trough-pge-project
1
click to invite
@Dunite @wolff, if the drills hit this time around, then this stock will not be in the 10-15 cent range, but somewhere much higher....
2
click to invite
@RedsoxFan @Dunite if...if...if....if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle... :) looking to DCA a bit more at these levels myself.
4
click to invite
@Amicus @RedsoxFan what's DCA mean?
0
click to invite
@wolff @Dunite Well just being conservative with a pre drilling results target - you are right ----when they hit it will be a big number - are you back to 1.5 yet?
1
click to invite
@Stargate2 The newer 88 claims group block will be subjected to an independent analysis later this spring....
1
click to invite
@RedsoxFan @amicus sorry, dollar cost avg.
1
click to invite
@CautiousNow @stargate2 In your most recent comments about the newer 88 claim block, I assume you're speaking of the block close to SE2 now? Some interesting information about the way that you're using the technology on the ADZ page (e.g., doing independent research, etc.). Perhaps warrants a repeat on here for the benefit of those who haven't seen it on the ADZ page? Also, is there a website on which more info is available?
3
click to invite
@ayeyou No they have no website I asked him that a week or two ago. To be honest I think stargate aka Ted is evasive when you ask him a simple straight forward question.This was his response re website... @Stargate2 ESS, at the present time, operates as a science foundation (non profit) and provides most of the output pro-bono.....
2
click to invite
@CautiousNow It would be great if Ian updated the materials on his website to offer a more current glimpse into NRN and its portfolio. The corporate presentation from September, for example, is not current and does not send the proper message about the importance of timely investor communication in this sector. While the technical work is really important, it's also very important to present a profile that reflects the reality that there are a lot of companies out there trying to attract and retain shareholders where everyone has a "story" of some sort they are trying to convey.
9
click to invite
@ayeyou Totally agree @CautiousNow .In this day and age there is no excuse for a company not to have updated websites. Sometimes it seems like these companies forget where the money comes from to pay their salaries and the cost of exploration. They are good at communicating when they are nearing a PP but after they have the cash its the cone of silence.
4
click to invite
@wolff Emailed NRN today to ask about the 88 new claims and re-iterate @Dunite s suggestion they sample around the lakes and do a little ice drilling next year - assuming they don't hit during this summers drill program. I may have to buy some more at the fire-sale 4.5 cent range.
1
click to invite
@Dunite Plan on buying some more myself this coming week after the 15th. @Stargate2 needs to learn about confidential agreements. Giving away what may be proprietary information will not be appreciated by any mining company and can end in unnecessary legal action. Thanks @wolff, for passing the suggestion on to NRN.....
2
click to invite
@PamplonaTrader e.g. $NXE $GPM $NRN $BMG $XOP etc
0
from #index,
click to invite
@CautiousNow Almost fell off the wagon and added another block today when the asks weren't moving toward me on $ADZ. Still on my radar screen, though, for a tax sheltered buy if the timing works on out a couple that are moving close to selling range.
0
click to invite
@Vaughan ADZ got a drilling permit with drilling to begin in MAy. An HRA Coffin pick that he equates to this years NRN. To get to where NRN was last year, it needs to hit close to .80c.
0
from #hotpick,
click to invite
@hunter @T - I have wondered the same re cross listed companies and if arbitrage opportunities exist when one exchange gets ahead of another. Example today with $NRN up 10%, and OTC version $NSHRF down 13%... 23% spread today...? #newbies
3
from #index,
click to invite
@Vaughan these guys are turning into the kings of closeology $CLE. $NXE, $NRN, $BGM, where else are they buying land based on other co's successes?
4
from #index,
click to invite
@Dunite @hunter, I find this interesting considering I was purchasing 300000 plus shares today.....
2
click to invite
@Dunite Almost forgot, I was told by Ian that news was forth coming....
4
click to invite
anonymous I agree with @nobody and his comments on $ADZ here as I went through $NRN story last year.
3
from #adz,
click to invite
anonymous $ADZ should not be compared to $NRN. $ADZ has IMO a much stronger case backed by multiple data sets pointing to same targets, and of course existing mines nearby. $NRN was more of a long shot.
4
from #adz,
click to invite
@Stargate2 When taking into account the risk/reward ratio between Adamera $ADZ and Northern Shield $NRN, there is no comparison.....Adamera fundamentals point towards a pre-drill data set being in place which has multiple layer's of support on which to base such a ratio whereas Northern Shield is much more of a virgin prospect in comparison......
5
from #adz,
click to invite
@DanO Don't fall in love with a stock. $nrn and others.
2
from ~roughingit,
click to invite
@Stargate2 Once our own program is completed over the region of the $CLE holdings, more data will be available to further determine the big picture virtues of the $NRN projects as well.
6
click to invite
@Jdc9449 ca
0
click to invite
@Dunite @Stargate2, I agree with @Jdc9449...CA, translates as Confidentiality Agreement. While I do not like CLE, I am sure Mr. Kalt would not like information pertaining to his operation plastered everywhere....Why would I as an exploration manager for an exploration company ever want to use you or your organization if you are going to give away proprietary secrets???
2
click to invite
@Stargate2 Not to worry, all work is performed under a regional R&D platform and any significant findings are openly shared with the company if they choose to request it.
0
click to invite
@Stargate2 Very much like the "Discover Abitibi" program where regional Airborne E.M. scoping programs were undertaken for the benefit of all who held property within the regions of deployment.
0
click to invite
@Vaughan That doesn't make sense @poolman. @teevee is sharing (from his years of experience) what he sees as issues with certain projects. In fact, @teevee brought $NRN to the table here first, and helps stimulate good conversations. Also, I believe he won the stock picking contest for 2016. (with high risk stocks).
11
from @ocotilloredux,
click to invite
@Stargate2 Some words of wisdon from the Adamera Minerals board.......The project does not need any more modeling performed to begin drilling as modeling is a very subjective undertaking according to the dimensional attributes of the person performing the task.....In other words, when 10 different modelers work on any one project, 10 different targeting substantiation opinions are returned as well, and this is the reason why many targets fail when test......The current state of the art within the electromagnetic survey technology sector is still very much based off of 1980's technology which was produced by Newmont, and is currently positioned as a mixture of 1980's hardware technology and 2017 software technology rolled into one......Due to the 1980's hardware technology base being a still present day component, there is a very predominant dependence on such data needing to be combined/interpreted through artificial intelligence algorithm applications such as inversion modeling programs (such programs take missing data and stitch together a kind of flow chat like process to build a picture) and furthermore, that such modeling still needs to be processed through a human being (The 10 to 1 ratio as we like to call it) the final outcome becomes very subjective towards what constitutes as a legitimate target deemed worthy to drill or most otherwise a false anomaly.....The present day survey technology hit to miss ratio is skewed very heavily towards the miss side of the fence and a classic example of this was Northern Shield drill program results base recently inured within Quebec.....On the flip side of the technology field we have the current state of the art "Stargate II" technology system which represents one of the few, true quantum leap advancements in technology development which utilizes true hardware based data technology returns and thus does not need to be post processed artificially afterwards....... In other words, "Stargate II" can provide a full array of hardware based anomaly detection spectrum within 2 hours after flight completion........."Stargate" II stands behind the validity of the $ADZ targeting returns and we of of the opinion that when all targets are tested, that the power of this new technology will prevail....Drilling will prove the point without question...........Retail investors should get ready for above expectation returns on this project
4
click to invite
@Markedtofuture $ADZ @Stargate2 Thanks for the explanation of the Stargate II technology vs the 1980's models.You previously mentioned confidence in other $NRN targets. Can you be more specific? TIA
3
from #index,
click to invite
@Stargate2 Yes there is great confidence in other projects. IDEFIX gets a major thumbs up as its one that we have had direct exposure over and can vouch for its authenticity of interpreted merit.....Out of all the Huckleberry region projects, all get thumbs up for potentiality except "Sequoi".....
2
click to invite
@RocketRed @Stargate2 has your technology even been proven to work point me to a discovery you made with it
4
click to invite
@DanO @stargate2 On $nrn. I have never bought they hype. It was an if. A big IF. When I finally had some time on my hands I had a look at their projects and BEFORE $nrn releasing their drill results (at top of the craziness) I published this https://goo.gl/NwjQxF As you can see my geophysicist friend I do not believe in Idefix (i.e. developing a mine there). A few better intersections maybe. But you recommend it. Good luck with it.
2
from ~roughingit,
click to invite
@Stargate2 Not a bad write up @DanO if i say so myself...Still, from our perspective, Idefix is being modeled as having more capacity to be a pure PGE play rather than a massive sulfide baseline setting with supporting evidence coming our own system returns over the region. Lac des Iles model comes to mind here.......
2
click to invite
@Stargate2 All of the Northern Shield projects have open end merit still in place except, in our opinion, Sequoi....The new 88 claims project is the one we would focus on if we had a choice on the matter.
1
click to invite
@Sarb @Stargate2 - Just curious, are you Ted ? used to post in the $NRN channel last year. Say YES or NO only.
1
from #adz,
click to invite
@Stargate2 Yes.....TED actually was a group I.D. for us
0
click to invite
@Dunite @Stargate2, While I do not agree with what you do. That is fly over someone's discovery and generate data that should be the rightful claim owners property and not yours. The fact that you do this with out their knowledge or permission makes it stolen intellectual property...So with that now stated, how does your "star gate 2 tech stack up to Robert Friedland's HPX technology. Inquiring minds really want to know.
3
click to invite
@RH @Dunite, when is there some news coming? We are nine days after your post, https://ceo.ca/nrn?20e8b31bd181
0
click to invite
@Dunite I now do not know. I have tried to call Ian to find out. I can only pass on what I was told. I have no idea what the delay is. The news was supposed to be new gravity findings of the area. Maybe they have found something more to add to the posting. I have notice that it seems there have been some small changes on the Corporate presentation.....
0
click to invite
@Dunite I Got ahold of Christine. There is A lot going on. A Gravity survey is in progress for Huckleberry. A Magnetic survey over Huckleberry with a drone toting a magnetometer starts Monday. That should be interesting using a magnetometer in this new fashion. I asked her to let me know how this worked as we might use one on our own project. Drilling starts Monday also at Huckleberry. They have hired a new Geologist to help with the work load at Huckleberry. So patience is in Order. OPTIMISM IS VERY HIGH with the people at NRN!!!! They admit that drilling Sequio was a damned if you do drill it and damned if you don't drill it situation due to the time of the year-Tax loss season...Exploration is a gamble......Ian has been at conference and a board of directors meeting....I myself hope to buy some more shares as what I heard sounded promising and not hype.....
8
click to invite
@Stargate2 Huckleberry still has open end potential so the next round of drilling will be significant again....
1